Peter King (R - NY) says it could be foreign, or it could be right wing extremists. Why is it nobody says it could be a left-wing extremist? After all, there are such things. Bill Ayres, founder of the Weather Underground, who introduced Obama to politics, and is now a respected figure in education, was a left wing extremist who built and detonated bombs in Chicago, New York and Washington DC, bombed the Pentagon, and says he’s sorry he didn’t do more.
We are not allowed to jump to the conclusion that the
Marathon Massacre could be Islamic terrorism, but we are encouraged to jump to
the conclusion that it could be domestic, right-wing terrorism. Jump fast, too,
before it’s disproved, so you can spread fear of fellow-Americans while you
have the chance. And when it is Islamic Terrorism, as in the case of Fort Hood,
it is called “workplace violence.” That killer, by the way, is still alive and
well, his trial having been long delayed because he would not give them
permission to cut his beard. That’s how we treat Islamic terrorists.
It’s said the IED is similar to those used in Iraq to kill
American soldiers. It wasn’t much mentioned until now, but one of the three
devices that were involved in the foiled 2010 Times Square attack was a
pressure cooker. There have been pressure cooker attacks in Pakistan and they
were the bomb casings in the Indian train attacks, a few years ago, that killed
over a hundred people. Of course anyone could have done it, but there’s a
website, Inspire, that tells you how to build one, and it’s for jihadists by
jihadists.
Roll back the clock. Having nothing to do with the
sequester, Obama cut in half the money for the Office of Prevention of Bombing,
in spite of warnings that these were in the works. Why would he do that?
Early in the Boston tragedy, a Saudi Man was arrested. You
may not be able to find these facts anymore, but here they are. He’s said to be
a witness, not a suspect. He was found running from the scene – well who
wouldn’t? He said he thought there would be another bomb. There was. He asked
if people were killed. And guess what! While he was under armed guard in a
hospital, they searched his house. But they won’t tell you that. The last
people in the world we can suspect are our sworn enemies who say they want to
kill us.
Oh, and have you heard this? All by himself, without telling
you, Obama has expanded terrorist access to USA soil. You might recall that 15
of the 9/11 attackers were Saudis. As was Obama’s trophy kill, Osama. Under the
president’s White House “deal” with the Saudi interior minister we’re now
fast-tracking Saudi students into the country via an entrusted traveler program
which relies only on the Saudi authorities to vet our honored guests.
That puts Saudis ahead of even European friends and allows
them to bypass Homeland Security scrutiny; our people will now share screening
with the Saudi government.
The president is going to bring the people who did this
thing in Boston to justice. Well, that’s not his jurisdiction. But bringing to
justice the murderers of our ambassador in Benghazi is solely his jurisdiction.
He said the same thing about them.
A quote from David Axelrod: I'm sure what was going
through the president's mind is -- we really don't know who did this -- it was
tax day. Was it someone who was pro-- you know, you just don't know.
That’s what your president thinks of you. And it’s you he’s
afraid of. The tax-paying citizens of America. There he is, hiding in the White
House, afraid of the people he’s stealing from. Afraid of the people paying for
his elaborate, excessive vacations and top of the 1 % lifestyle. Afraid of the
people whose money he’s taking to give to the Muslim Brotherhood. Afraid of the
people whose wealth he’s stealing to support his effort to control them through
his health care tax program, the unaffordable Affordable Health Care Act. Does
this sound like a man who’d like to take guns away from the people he’s afraid
of, or what? Before he was elected, he told a reporter that he doesn’t think
people should have guns.
Now he says you’re silly to think he wants to take your guns
away. Tell me… who’s being silly?
The administration will be very busy obeying Rahm Emanuel’s
advice not to waste a crisis. A large part of the Left’s brain is taken up with
the picture of a gun surrounded by a circle, with a big red diagonal line drawn
across it.
Does it matter that no guns were used in the attack at the
Boston marathon? No. They want a gun control law, even though everyone, left
and right, admits that the law they are trying to push through the Senate would
not have stopped the killings at Sandy Hook or anyplace else. The laws on our
books already address that. We need no more gun laws to defend ourselves
against the people who have perpetrated these acts.
But none of this matters. Nothing matters except to take
guns away from the lawful citizens of America. Why is that? Because we have an
unlawful government afraid of its lawful citizens. The second amendment is
there, among other things, to protect against the lawlessness of our current
administration that rams through bills before anybody can read them, that
refuses to enforce the laws on the books, that creates its own unlawful rules
and regulations in order to get around the desires of the people.
Watch for the government’s use of this tragic event to take
away your right of self-defense. Listen for the mention of guns when no guns
were involved. Monitor the media in their attempt to turn this into an attack
on your individual civil rights. Keep your eye on the upcoming UN Arms Trade
Treaty nullifying the Second Amendment.
