Allahu Akbar

A reader asked: Who the hell are the criminals here? We had a Boston lock-down with the 99.9999 % of the population innocent, yet kept inside the danger zone, not allowed to move, forced into their houses to wait for the bombers to come knocking. . Boston has very strict gun laws. Would you like to be locked in your house with nothing but a steak knife to protect you? I isn’t it the criminals who are supposed to be locked up?

Terrorists have seriously degraded our flying experience. Now they know they can shut down a major city with their dastardly deeds. And what’s coming next? Curfews with police combing the streets? It’s happened in other places, and now we know it can happen here. Anything can.

You can’t even pronounce the words “Islamic Terrorist.” When it comes to those two words, your vocal chords have become politically correct. We know the brothers were Islamists. We know they were terrorists. But there is no such thing as an Islamist Terrorist. Try to say the phrase. You’ll see - you cringe.

Well, we’ve got one in custody now, and what are we doing? Feeling sorry for him because we treated him and his brother so callously that they had to go out with bombs full of nails to create amputees out of another set of innocent Americans.

Give a thought to those people if you can spare one. Imagine yourself one of them. One day you’re a normal American going out to watch a race, and the next day your life has been completely changed. A chunk of your body was slashed to ribbons and is now gone; this is your new existence.

Think of the relatives of those who are dead and maimed. They loved those people. Do you love anybody? Imagine going to identify the remains of your beautiful daughter or young son. Or of visiting that lucky survivor who went to a race and now has no legs. Go ahead. Use your imagination. I dare you.

You just wait. This murderer is going to get psychological help. Pathetic Americans with guilty consciences for living decent lives are going to transfer their pity from the thousands of family members of his victims, to him.

Ever hear of “An Eye for an Eye” Of course not. We don’t read the Bible anymore. It means what it says. If you intentionally blind another person – just one – the law blinds you. If anything is fair, that is. What the maimer deserves is just what he gave. He’s in the hospital. Amputate his legs. See how he likes that. Oh, oh, oh, how cruel, you say. Well, maybe I had a sad childhood. Maybe my father had to fix cars on the street to make a living. Maybe my brother didn’t make it from the Golden Gloves to the Olympics. That’s reason enough, isn’t it?

And don’t believe that these guys worked alone. Don’t believe that the Federales don’t know more than they’re telling you.

Why are we in denial? Why can’t we watch the people who announce that they want to kill us? We’re so hung up on being fair that we refuse to take precautions against likely trouble-makers. We all know now that the FBI did not follow through on the older brother when they were warned. And this isn’t the first time they’ve had a Muslim terrorist in their sights only to let him go about trying to blow us up. They say they can’t follow through on every complaint. Why not? Are they short of manpower?

We need more, not less, profiling. We need to stop wasting our resources feeling up 85-year-old ladies going to visit their great-grandchildren. We need to pay attention when we see someone’s website urging friends to murder non-Muslims.

You know there’s something wrong when a Muslim, who has been giving pro-jihad lectures in the army, yells “Allahu Akbar!” as he murders thirteen soldiers, and it’s officially called, “workplace violence.” It was done in the name of a religion that our president calls “a religion of peace.”

Really! Peace? Don’t we all know what jihad means? Don’t we all know that if a religion says it’s good and right to kill infidels, that there should be no other religion and every soul on earth must accept it, that this religion is sanctioning the killing of everyone else? They say so themselves. They may be right that the only way to have peace is to have only Islam, because until we do, they will not allow anyone else to live in peace. It’s been going on for longer than there’s been an America. We do a disservice to religious freedom by granting a confederation of murderous extremists our First Amendment privileges.

If there are Muslims who do not profess jihad, let them stand up and say so. If they’re sitting in a mosque listening to a lecture on how Islam is the only religion, and they are the only people entitled to live on Earth, let’s treat them as what they are: an enemy in our midst, silently condoning our murder by their more active brethren.

Our president may have qualms about singling out his father’s, his step-father’s, and his early childhood teachers’ religion for condemnation. This is either weakness or agreement. Either way, we can not let his roots affect our self-preservation. Let’s call Islam what it is: a religion of hate speech and hate crimes.

They are winning the battle for the world, because we nice, good, damn-fool dummies, who can’t believe that anything can be as bad as what Islamists claim to be. No matter how loud they shout it, we ignore that they are determined to rid the earth of us in the name of Allah.

I have one more sentence for those of you crying for the killer. Here it is: “I once knew a man whose mind was so open, his brains fell out.”

The Boston Massacre and You

Peter King (R - NY) says it could be foreign, or it could be right wing extremists. Why is it nobody says it could be a left-wing extremist? After all, there are such things. Bill Ayres, founder of the Weather Underground, who introduced Obama to politics, and is now a respected figure in education, was a left wing extremist who built and detonated bombs in Chicago, New York and Washington DC, bombed the Pentagon, and says he’s sorry he didn’t do more.

We are not allowed to jump to the conclusion that the Marathon Massacre could be Islamic terrorism, but we are encouraged to jump to the conclusion that it could be domestic, right-wing terrorism. Jump fast, too, before it’s disproved, so you can spread fear of fellow-Americans while you have the chance. And when it is Islamic Terrorism, as in the case of Fort Hood, it is called “workplace violence.” That killer, by the way, is still alive and well, his trial having been long delayed because he would not give them permission to cut his beard. That’s how we treat Islamic terrorists.

It’s said the IED is similar to those used in Iraq to kill American soldiers. It wasn’t much mentioned until now, but one of the three devices that were involved in the foiled 2010 Times Square attack was a pressure cooker. There have been pressure cooker attacks in Pakistan and they were the bomb casings in the Indian train attacks, a few years ago, that killed over a hundred people. Of course anyone could have done it, but there’s a website, Inspire, that tells you how to build one, and it’s for jihadists by jihadists.

Roll back the clock. Having nothing to do with the sequester, Obama cut in half the money for the Office of Prevention of Bombing, in spite of warnings that these were in the works. Why would he do that?

Early in the Boston tragedy, a Saudi Man was arrested. You may not be able to find these facts anymore, but here they are. He’s said to be a witness, not a suspect. He was found running from the scene – well who wouldn’t? He said he thought there would be another bomb. There was. He asked if people were killed. And guess what! While he was under armed guard in a hospital, they searched his house. But they won’t tell you that. The last people in the world we can suspect are our sworn enemies who say they want to kill us.

Oh, and have you heard this? All by himself, without telling you, Obama has expanded terrorist access to USA soil. You might recall that 15 of the 9/11 attackers were Saudis. As was Obama’s trophy kill, Osama. Under the president’s White House “deal” with the Saudi interior minister we’re now fast-tracking Saudi students into the country via an entrusted traveler program which relies only on the Saudi authorities to vet our honored guests.

That puts Saudis ahead of even European friends and allows them to bypass Homeland Security scrutiny; our people will now share screening with the Saudi government.

The president is going to bring the people who did this thing in Boston to justice. Well, that’s not his jurisdiction. But bringing to justice the murderers of our ambassador in Benghazi is solely his jurisdiction. He said the same thing about them.

A quote from David Axelrod: I'm sure what was going through the president's mind is -- we really don't know who did this -- it was tax day. Was it someone who was pro-- you know, you just don't know.

That’s what your president thinks of you. And it’s you he’s afraid of. The tax-paying citizens of America. There he is, hiding in the White House, afraid of the people he’s stealing from. Afraid of the people paying for his elaborate, excessive vacations and top of the 1 % lifestyle. Afraid of the people whose money he’s taking to give to the Muslim Brotherhood. Afraid of the people whose wealth he’s stealing to support his effort to control them through his health care tax program, the unaffordable Affordable Health Care Act. Does this sound like a man who’d like to take guns away from the people he’s afraid of, or what? Before he was elected, he told a reporter that he doesn’t think people should have guns.

Now he says you’re silly to think he wants to take your guns away. Tell me… who’s being silly?

The administration will be very busy obeying Rahm Emanuel’s advice not to waste a crisis. A large part of the Left’s brain is taken up with the picture of a gun surrounded by a circle, with a big red diagonal line drawn across it.

Does it matter that no guns were used in the attack at the Boston marathon? No. They want a gun control law, even though everyone, left and right, admits that the law they are trying to push through the Senate would not have stopped the killings at Sandy Hook or anyplace else. The laws on our books already address that. We need no more gun laws to defend ourselves against the people who have perpetrated these acts.

But none of this matters. Nothing matters except to take guns away from the lawful citizens of America. Why is that? Because we have an unlawful government afraid of its lawful citizens. The second amendment is there, among other things, to protect against the lawlessness of our current administration that rams through bills before anybody can read them, that refuses to enforce the laws on the books, that creates its own unlawful rules and regulations in order to get around the desires of the people.

Watch for the government’s use of this tragic event to take away your right of self-defense. Listen for the mention of guns when no guns were involved. Monitor the media in their attempt to turn this into an attack on your individual civil rights. Keep your eye on the upcoming UN Arms Trade Treaty nullifying the Second Amendment.

Income Tax

Everybody should pay income tax. Only half of us do now. That other half knows nothing about the feeling of having your money taken away. They should know what it feels like, even if it’s given back to them in another form. They should have the sensation of being robbed, just like the rest of us do.

Having only half the population pay income tax has some bad effects. One is resentment on the part of the payers.

Another is greed on the part of the payees. Of course they’ll vote for higher and higher taxes. They get, but don’t have to give.

Unless you pay taxes, you don’t have a stake in the government's wasting of your money. More people, including the poor, should resent the fact that the congress makes themselves millionaires. More people, including the poor, should resent Obama’s spending billions of their money on his vacations and his friends.

What do we support with our taxes? Some good things, plus a lot of graft, waste, fraud, and downright stealing. Let’s call for a universal income tax. That would be FAIR!